California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): A Roadmap to ComplianceHeading

Want to know more? Click here to register for the adjoining webinar!

Read the complete white paper here: California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): A Roadmap to Compliance

Executive Summary

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA 2020), which went into effect earlier this year, is certainly not the first legislation in this area. Over the past few decades, numerous legislations have been enacted to protect the privacy and personal data of consumers. Most notably these include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA 1996), Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA 1999), Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH 2009), Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA 1974), and Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA 1978). While these are sectorial laws focused on specific industries, CCPA is focused on all California consumer data and includes a carve-out for GLBA and HIPPA.

In this white paper is a technical roadmap of primary capabilities that must be implemented to meet CCPA. We see these capabilities as:

  • Track and act on consumer requests.
  • Understand what information is captured and what categories it falls under based on CCPA guidelines.
  • Capture and document the process for complying with the law.
  • Document the purpose and use of the information captured.
  • Communicate the information to the consumer and provide the ability to request the removal of information.
  • Capture consent of the consumer for the storage and use of their personal information.

Through a combination of partner tools and products provided by companies such as Informatica, cataloging data and its processes can be combined in a modular way to address each of these needs.

Addressing CCPA – Triggers, Response, & Challenges

Based on what is understood about the law, from a technical standpoint, identifying the information, processing requests, and identifying and cataloging the location and purpose behind the information’s capture is necessary to begin to comply with the law. Key triggers prompting regulatory inquiry include:

  • Data breaches: CCPA is not particularly nuanced about sensitive data and the California Department of Justice focuses on breaches/complaints and harm done.
  • Number of complaints: An increase in the number of complaints.
  • New technologies: Technologies like facial recognition require effective risk assessment for compliance.

Since the law came into effect, the California Attorney General has provided additional information including a second set of modifications to the proposed regulation. Even as rule-making activities move forward, there has not been a spike in what consumers request. This is an evolving space with a significant amount of uncertainty as new versions of CCPA are rolled out, including details around ‘deletion’ and what it means.

Receiving, Handling, & Tracking Requests
The most obvious need is the ability for the organization to interact and communicate with the consumer based on the requests. We are quite certain any company that must comply with the law already has a means to process consumers’ requests. In processing said requests, statistics about the interactions and resolution, type, etc. can also be readily assembled and reported on. A dashboard to present the statistics, such as number and type of inquiry, the number of requests processed, and their current status would go a long way in satisfying a regulator’s assessment of the organization’s compliance with the law. The California Attorney General has built a data broker registry which supports the compliance check. Companies such as SayMine.com handle requests through a single process for data handling.

Operational Challenges
Successfully operationalizing the law involves verification of the individual for data identification, deletion, or enabling an opt-out request. Paradigm Technology has enabled this through data catalog development, such as Informatica’s Data Privacy Management, which helps organizations identify Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Personal Health Information (PHI), and other sensitive data with ease. Additionally, our governance accelerator workflows – including defining a business rule, proposing new governance assets, and unsubscribing capabilities – enable our clients to further identify and handle data. Smaller companies that are unable to build a comprehensive infrastructure internally are managing this through service provider arrangements. Companies that hire third-party brokers make managing requests an outsourced dialog between the consumers and the business with the service provider.

Whether handled in-house or through a third-party, some common challenges we’ve helped our clients overcome include:

  • Locating data: It remains a difficult task for most organizations. Companies still struggle bringing the right data to the right person at the right time for activities such as analytics and marketing, let alone lawful compliance.
    • Our experts helped a client identify, scan, and profile 200 data elements, 8.4 million variables, and 2.9 billion rows.
  • Tracking and managing consent: Usually this is nothing more than a webpage popup notifying the user of a website that their information is being captured and requesting an opt-in. What it does not necessarily do is capture that consent across the data and many systems that capture it.
    • We simplified and automated a search for related information, reducing search time by 31%.
  • Service level agreements (SLA’s) and audit: Documentation and proof that the request has been processed and completed are required for internal and external management of such data.
    • Our data scientists enabled our client to track data lineage, perform data profiling, search data, and view data quality scores for a target quality increase of 28%.
  • CCPA hotline messages: Often they are unclear, and it can be difficult to identify the last name and email address which are essential with the obligation to follow up if the data isn’t provided.
  • Data requests with specific look-back and restore needs: These are different for varying industries and require clear policies covering data collection, data quality, management, purpose of usage, usage limitation, data security safeguards, openness, and individual roles and accountability.
    • By enabling semantic search, the ability to search with meaning, we helped our client see an estimated 13% profitability increase.

Read the complete white paper here: California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): A Roadmap to Compliance

Click here to register for the adjoining webinar!

Recent Posts

Enabling Digital Intelligence Through ThoughtSpot

Written by: Azmath Pasha, Chief Digital Officer, and Kireet Kokala, Cloud Delivery Leader Click here for the complete white paper: Enabling Digital Intelligence Though ThoughtSpot ThoughtSpot, a modern cloud analytics company makes it easy for business teams to ask questions while providing power and flexibility for data experts. While ThoughtSpot’s platform has been around for almost a decade, it has recently enjoyed a larger audience thanks in part to data intelligence solutions that are being pushed by Snowflake Data Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and several others.

Intelligent Data Governance for AI in Financial Services

As data becomes increasingly strategic in the financial sector, traditional data governance approaches must evolve to handle massive data volumes, complex regulatory landscapes, and dynamic risk factors. Intelligent data governance leverages artificial intelligence and machine learning not just to manage data but to actively enhance quality, compliance, and decision-making processes. This guide presents a framework for intelligent data governance tailored for financial services, outlining how AI and ML transform oversight, risk management, and regulatory adherence.

Quantifying the Value of Data in Financial Services

In the financial services sector, data is a critical asset that drives profitability, risk management, regulatory compliance, and competitive edge. However, measuring its value remains challenging for many CFOs across sectors of the financial services industry regardless of organizational size or country of operations. CFOs rely on accurate data for forecasting, budgeting, and strategic planning. Quality data leads to better decision-making, optimized capital allocation, and swift responses to market changes. It is also vital for risk management, regulatory compliance (e.g., BCBS 239, Basel III, AML/KYC), and avoiding fines and reputational damage. “Fit for Business Use” data also supports customer retention, personalized services, and improved revenue stability. Data-savvy CFOs leverage insights for long-term growth.

7 Step Guide to Intelligent Data for Smarter AI

In a world driven by digital innovation, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a cornerstone of business outcomes. However, AI’s ability to deliver meaningful, reliable insights hinges on the quality of the data it processes. Organizations that prioritize intelligent data management can unlock smarter AI capabilities, driving transformation and competitive advantage.

Untangling Data Quality & Data Mastering: A Guide to Making the Right Choice

> Click here for the full white paper. In today’s data-driven world, where AI and generative AI are rapidly transforming industries, businesses depend heavily on accurate, consistent, and trustworthy data to fuel these innovations. AI-driven initiatives cannot succeed without high-quality, mastered data that ensures reliability and trust in AI-generated insights and outcomes. However, the lines between data quality and data mastering are often blurred, leading to confusion about which solution is most suitable for a given challenge.

Empowering AI Initiatives with Governed Data

The global market for AI data management is projected to grow to $70B by 2026, driven by the increasing demand for AI solutions across industries. However, the success of AI initiatives depends largely on the quality and governance of data. Without high-quality, governed data, AI systems cannot function effectively, leading to unreliable outputs and potential ethical issues. This white paper explores the importance of data governance for AI initiatives, the challenges and opportunities in data management, and the strategic approaches and best practices for empowering AI with governed data. It also showcases the partnership between Paradigm Technology and Informatica, which provides organizations with the expertise and tools needed to harness the full potential of data for AI. By implementing robust data governance frameworks and leveraging advanced AI tools, organizations can ensure their AI projects are ethical, compliant, and effective, and achieve better outcomes and drive innovation.

The Value Black Hole of Application Rationalization | White Paper

Digital transformation and multi-cloud adoption are driving almost if not all organizations to rethink their application landscapes. In this Q&A session, the Paradigm team explores what application rationalization is, how to avoid the pitfalls, what success looks like, and how to get started.

Find & Subscribe to Cloud Data

Click here for the complete white paper: Find & Subscribe to Cloud Data Business Challenges & Snowflake Marketplace Value Snowflake, at its core, is a platform used by thousands of customers to mobilize their data: users bring all their data into one place and derive value from it. Customers can not only bring in their own first-party operational data but can augment it with other valuable data sources to enrich what they already own. Snowflake Marketplace was built to help companies discover and directly access data that originates outside their organization.

ESG 411: The ESG Data Challenge

By Liam Varn, Director Click here for the complete white paper – ESG 411: The ESG Data Challenge For those fresh to the concept, ESG is an opportunity to quantify the performance or risk of companies along the lines of Environmental, Social, and Governance factors. Investors are increasingly applying these non-financial factors to their analysis process and in turn placing pressure on those underlying companies to align their behavior accordingly. ESG metrics are not part of mandatory financial reporting, but most corporations disclose ESG data through sustainability reports or even as part of their annual financial reporting.

Lens into AI-Driven Self-Service

Azmath Pasha, Chief Digital Officer, Paradigm Technology Chris Gately, Chief Revenue Officer, Paradigm Technology
Michael Setticasi, VP of Strategic Partnerships, ThoughtSpot Click here for the complete white paper: Lens into AI-Driven Self-Service